Client Meetings, Online Accounting

Are client meetings taxes deductible? We often get this question so we thought that some simple tips can help go quite a distance in training whether you can state a tax deduction. It often comes down from what is provided at the client conference (i.e. food or drink). What’s being provided in the conference – could it be a light meal provided at the job or is it a set menu with coordinating wines?

When is the conference being kept – meals provided during work hours are less likely to be entertainment, however with this point it’s especially important to consider the purpose and whether it’s cultural. Where is the conference being kept – meetings kept on your business premises (and foods consumed) are less likely to be entertainment. At a cafe or restaurant, it is more likely to be entertainment. Are your customer meetings taxes deductible? Always make sure you consider these initial steps when looking at client meetings for your business.

TransCanada is trying to get the largest income they can, and the Keystone XL pipeline is not illegal. Individualism is small in its applications though, as it doesn’t consider all the stakeholders suffering from the business. Utilitarianism can be an ethical theory based around the happiness of all in an action. Utilitarianism declares the best action is one that maximizes utility. Tool is described by different people in different ways, but is the well-being of sentient entities generally, like people and animals.

Jeremy Bentham, the creator of Utilitarianism, explains utility as the sum of all pleasure and pain gained from an action, pleasure being positive and pain being negative. So, according to Utilitarianism, animals are a stakeholder in this case with pollution and the destruction of their home the main interest. TransCanada’s stockholders are happy because of the increased profits gained from the pipeline, but they represent a small part of the stakeholders.

Workers associated with oil production and structure of the pipeline are happy in this case with the upsurge in jobs and the growth of the overall economy around Alberta. The workers in workers and Alberta building the pipeline are a larger group than the stockholders but do not stand for the majority of the stakeholders still. The largest group of stakeholders will be the people whose land is being taken by the government and the animals hurt by the pollution in Alberta and the pollution along the pipeline.

The farmers and landowners are not happy using their land being extracted from them without a say by the federal government. And the pets suffering from this pipeline are harmed when their homes will be destroyed and their lives threatened by the structure of the pipeline and increased oil production in Alberta.

  1. Who he/she is
  2. Austin – 2.6
  3. Get a design back again which might or may not include those ideas
  4. Be a non-citizen of america residing in the State of Illinois
  5. Management information system
  6. Is there another plan for significant unique property
  7. Seasonal photos or videos (e.g., photos from a Christmas party)
  8. Prepare a Business Plan

Therefore, regarding Utilitarianism, this full case is not ethical. Utilitarianism is also flawed like Individualism. Utilitarianism only focuses on the end, rather than the means. Slavery shouldn’t be used even if it is for the common good. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher during the Enlightenment. Kant is known as a central body in a modern idea and developed an ethical theory predicated on actions as opposed to the results. Kantianism states the only positive thing is goodwill; an action is only good if it comes after moral laws. Actions must be rational and have good intentions. Actions cannot be in contrast to established moral laws and regulations and must benefit someone in someway. Individual freedoms and rights must also be respected.

TransCanada does not respect the individual rights people have to their property along the pipeline path by using eminent website to take their land. TransCanada is acting rational however by building a pipeline to improve the profit of the ongoing company. The means are suitable according to Kant, and the ends are also appropriate; as a business it is their job to increase profit because of their stockholders.

TransCanada is respecting the employees associated with the pipeline and essential oil in Alberta by giving jobs and financial growth. However, the treatment of farmers and landowners along the pipeline path is undesirable to Kant, and for that reason this case is unethical. This case could become ethical if TransCanada would respect the landowner’s wishes never to have a pipeline built on the land.